Author summary
94%1 analyzed article/video988 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WPR results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Hasty Generalization, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 426 hits. Analysis detected 3,620 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,964 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 68% (1,747 of 5,453 authors). This WPR is worse (more manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group.
WPR
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
WPR attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
WPR vs sitewide
WPR attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.