Keyword summary
49%1 analyzed article/video444 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Flores results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 204 hits. Analysis detected 1,193 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 66% (19,818 of 57,691 keywords). This Daniel Flores is worse (more manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group.
Daniel Flores
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
66%Daniel Flores (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,776
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

66% percentile
025507510065.6% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos