Keyword summary
ā 68%1 analyzed article/video462 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Osborn results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 390 hits. Analysis detected 1,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ā 75% (12,760 of 49,491 keywords). This Dan Osborn is worse (more manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group.
Dan Osborn
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Dan Osborn attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Dan Osborn vs sitewide
Dan Osborn attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.