Keyword summary
82%1 analyzed article/video551 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Negrea results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 452 hits. Analysis detected 2,014 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 66% (17,202 of 50,158 keywords). This Dan Negrea is worse (more manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group.
Dan Negrea
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Dan Negrea attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Dan Negrea vs sitewide
Dan Negrea attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.