Keyword summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video955 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Curry Barker results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.1% saturation with 1,492 hits. Analysis detected 4,792 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (8,090 of 52,778 keywords). This Curry Barker is worse (more manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group.
Curry Barker
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠85%Curry Barker (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,820
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

85% percentile
025507510084.7% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 39.1%39.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 39.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Horn Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.0%Straw Man: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos