Keyword summary
89% 1 analyzed article/video 273 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cueta results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 221 hits . Analysis detected 1,246 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,092 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 88% (6,321 of 51,354 keywords). This Cueta is worse (more manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group. Cueta
Keyword details
Total words: 1,092
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.7% percentile 5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 20.2% 20.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 20.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 8.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 3.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst