Keyword summary
77%1 analyzed article/video1,477 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cost Cutting Energy Projects results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 1,011 hits. Analysis detected 6,587 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 65% (17,673 of 49,919 keywords). This Cost Cutting Energy Projects is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Cost Cutting Energy Projects
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Cost Cutting Energy Projects attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Cost Cutting Energy Projects vs sitewide
Cost Cutting Energy Projects attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.