BS Summary: These Consumer Spending results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anchoring Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 1,603 hits. Analysis detected 6,761 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,350 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (15,677 of 23,507 keywords). This Consumer Spending is better (less manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Consumer Spending
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Wholegrains0%
⁠0%Weed0%
⁠0%Wang Wen0%
⁠0%Vegetation Fire0%
⁠0%U S House0%
⁠34%Consumer Spending (selected)3%
⁠100%Reuven Carlyle60%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,350
Article count: 3
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Consumer Spending attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Consumer Spending vs All Other Publications
Consumer Spending attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.