Keyword summary
68% 1 analyzed article/video 860 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clean Heat Standard results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 754 hits . Analysis detected 2,175 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,440 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 38% (32,955 of 53,020 keywords). This Clean Heat Standard is better (less manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group. Clean Heat Standard
Keyword details
Total words: 3,440
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 21.9% 21.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 21.9%, sitewide 3.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst