Keyword summary
40%1 analyzed article/video2,785 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clean Energy Myths results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 639 hits. Analysis detected 5,953 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 8% (46,506 of 50,223 keywords). This Clean Energy Myths is better (less manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group.
Clean Energy Myths
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Clean Energy Myths attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Clean Energy Myths vs sitewide
Clean Energy Myths attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.