Keyword summary
93% 1 analyzed article/video 747 analyzed words
BS Summary: These City Boundaries results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 796 hits . Analysis detected 3,923 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 70% (17,220 of 56,458 keywords). This City Boundaries is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group. City Boundaries
Keyword details
Total words: 2,988
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.5% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 26.6% 26.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 26.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst