Keyword summary
28% 1 analyzed article/video 730 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Citizens Budget Commission results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Loss Aversion , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 205 hits . Analysis detected 1,287 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,920 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 43% (29,571 of 51,345 keywords). This Citizens Budget Commission is better (less manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group. Citizens Budget Commission
Keyword details
Total words: 2,920
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst