Keyword summary
2%1 analyzed article/video613 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Speelman results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Anchoring Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 3.1% saturation with 75 hits. Analysis detected 188 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,452 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 11% (52,096 of 58,511 keywords). This Chris Speelman is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
Chris Speelman
Keyword details
Ranking context
Position among analyzed keywords
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile
Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
Sitewide departure map
Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often