Keyword summary
93%1 analyzed article/video648 analyzed words
BS Summary: These China Threat To Lng Futures results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 358 hits. Analysis detected 2,167 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,944 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 73% (9,169 of 33,961 keywords). This China Threat To Lng Futures is worse (more manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group.
China Threat To Lng Futures
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
China Threat To Lng Futures attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
China Threat To Lng Futures vs sitewide
China Threat To Lng Futures attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.