Keyword summary
ā 51%1 analyzed article/video1,125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These China Oil Investment Iraq results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 447 hits. Analysis detected 1,999 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ā 36% (32,241 of 50,130 keywords). This China Oil Investment Iraq is better (less manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group.
China Oil Investment Iraq
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
China Oil Investment Iraq attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
China Oil Investment Iraq vs sitewide
China Oil Investment Iraq attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.