Keyword summary
65% 1 analyzed article/video 85 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chief Strategist results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias , Framing Effect , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 40 hits . Analysis detected 202 faulty-reasoning hits from 340 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 92% (4,441 of 53,604 keywords). This Chief Strategist is worse (more manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group. Chief Strategist
Keyword details
Total words: 340
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.7% percentile 6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles340 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst