Keyword summary
74%1 analyzed article/video1,039 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cherelle L Parker results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 788 hits. Analysis detected 4,362 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 72% (14,572 of 51,446 keywords). This Cherelle L Parker is worse (more manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group.
Cherelle L Parker
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
72%Cherelle L Parker (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,156
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

72% percentile
025507510071.7% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 19.0%19.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 12.0%12.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos