Keyword summary
57% 1 analyzed article/video 251 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charlotte Mecklenburg Library results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 147 hits . Analysis detected 720 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,004 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 88% (7,669 of 59,653 keywords). This Charlotte Mecklenburg Library is worse (more manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group. Charlotte Mecklenburg Library
Keyword details
Total words: 1,004
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.1% percentile 5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst