Keyword summary
7%1 analyzed article/video1,834 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles Lindbergh results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.3% saturation with 318 hits. Analysis detected 1,664 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 3% (49,469 of 50,669 keywords). This Charles Lindbergh is better (less manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group.
Charles Lindbergh
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Charles Lindbergh attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Charles Lindbergh vs sitewide
Charles Lindbergh attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.