Keyword summary
⁠1%1 analyzed article/video463 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Center For Good Food Purchasing results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Indoctrination, and Unattributed Quote, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 1.8% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 69 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,389 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (31,920 of 32,814 keywords). This Center For Good Food Purchasing is better (less manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group.
Center For Good Food Purchasing
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠3%Center For Good Food Purchasing (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,389
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Center For Good Food Purchasing attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Center For Good Food Purchasing vs sitewide
Center For Good Food Purchasing attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos