Keyword summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video541 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caves results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Overconfidence Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 85 hits. Analysis detected 326 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ā 9% (26,195 of 28,615 keywords). This Caves is better (less manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group.
Caves
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Caves attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Caves vs sitewide
Caves attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.