Keyword summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video731 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cambridge City Council results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 225 hits. Analysis detected 2,447 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,924 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (17,702 of 50,208 keywords). This Cambridge City Council is worse (more manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Cambridge City Council
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠65%Cambridge City Council (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,924
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Cambridge City Council attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Cambridge City Council vs sitewide
Cambridge City Council attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos