Keyword summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video780 analyzed words
BS Summary: These California Fish And Wildlife Department results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 1,573 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (27,413 of 49,525 keywords). This California Fish And Wildlife Department is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
California Fish And Wildlife Department
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,120
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
California Fish And Wildlife Department attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
California Fish And Wildlife Department vs sitewide
California Fish And Wildlife Department attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos