Keyword summary
22% 2 analyzed articles/videos 935 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cal Poly Humboldt results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 222 hits . Analysis detected 1,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,740 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 29% (40,453 of 56,739 keywords). This Cal Poly Humboldt is better (less manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group. Cal Poly Humboldt
Keyword details
Total words: 3,740
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.7% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst