Keyword summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video445 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bridges Healthcare results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Indoctrination, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 221 hits. Analysis detected 1,710 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (12,473 of 53,020 keywords). This Bridges Healthcare is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
Bridges Healthcare
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠77%Bridges Healthcare (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,780
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

77% percentile
025507510076.5% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.9%2.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Special Pleading: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos