Keyword summary
⁠39%2 analyzed articles/videos1,658 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Black Hat results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 1,000 hits. Analysis detected 3,777 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,850 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (47,781 of 59,653 keywords). This Black Hat is better (less manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group.
Black Hat
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠20%Black Hat (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,850
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

20% percentile
025507510019.9% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Horn Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos