Keyword summary
79%1 analyzed article/video880 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bell Federal Savings results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 506 hits. Analysis detected 2,431 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,640 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 76% (7,631 of 31,098 keywords). This Bell Federal Savings is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Bell Federal Savings
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Bell Federal Savings attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Bell Federal Savings vs sitewide
Bell Federal Savings attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.