Keyword summary
46% 2 analyzed articles/videos 964 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Autism Therapy results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 480 hits . Analysis detected 3,183 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,176 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 43% (34,524 of 59,727 keywords). This Autism Therapy is better (less manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group. Autism Therapy
Keyword details
Total words: 5,176
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst