Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video735 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Australian Food And Drink results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Anecdotal, and Optimism Bias, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 360 hits. Analysis detected 1,764 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,940 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (16,415 of 29,035 keywords). This Australian Food And Drink is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
Australian Food And Drink
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠44%Australian Food And Drink (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,940
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Australian Food And Drink attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Australian Food And Drink vs sitewide
Australian Food And Drink attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos