Keyword summary
ā 30%1 analyzed article/video1,155 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Attorney General Nominee results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 569 hits. Analysis detected 3,453 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,620 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ā 43% (29,670 of 51,260 keywords). This Attorney General Nominee is better (less manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Attorney General Nominee
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
ā 0%Property Transfers1%
ā 0%Madison Township1%
ā 0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
ā 0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
ā 0%Paul Demark1%
ā 43%Attorney General Nominee (selected)3%
ā 100%Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%Mike Lewis60%
ā 100%Joni Balter60%
ā 100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,620
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Attorney General Nominee attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Attorney General Nominee vs sitewide
Attorney General Nominee attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos