Keyword summary
94% 1 analyzed article/video 714 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Atria Books results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 817 hits . Analysis detected 4,246 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 86% (7,678 of 53,344 keywords). This Atria Books is worse (more manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group. Atria Books
Keyword details
Total words: 2,856
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.6% percentile 5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 28.6% 28.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 28.6%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 8.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.5% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst