Keyword summary
67%2 analyzed articles/videos667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arsenic And Old Lace results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 1,006 hits. Analysis detected 3,741 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,155 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 57% (25,631 of 59,653 keywords). This Arsenic And Old Lace is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Arsenic And Old Lace
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
57%Arsenic And Old Lace (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,155
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510057.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 24.2%24.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 24.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos