Keyword summary
29%1 analyzed article/video1,334 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal Feeding Operations results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 462 hits. Analysis detected 2,768 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 34% (35,312 of 53,074 keywords). This Animal Feeding Operations is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
Animal Feeding Operations
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
34%Animal Feeding Operations (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,336
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

34% percentile
025507510033.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos