Keyword summary
29% 1 analyzed article/video 1,334 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal Feeding Operations results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 462 hits . Analysis detected 2,768 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 34% (35,312 of 53,074 keywords). This Animal Feeding Operations is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group. Animal Feeding Operations
Keyword details
Total words: 5,336
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst