Keyword summary
92% 1 analyzed article/video 304 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Americans For Prosperity results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 337 hits . Analysis detected 1,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 89% (5,738 of 51,677 keywords). This Americans For Prosperity is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group. Americans For Prosperity
Keyword details
Total words: 1,216
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.9% percentile 5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 27.7% 27.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 27.7%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst