Keyword summary
28% 1 analyzed article/video 1,380 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Williams results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 354 hits . Analysis detected 2,199 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,520 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 15% (51,061 of 59,653 keywords). This Amanda Williams is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group. Amanda Williams
Keyword details
Total words: 5,520
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.4% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst