Keyword summary
91% 1 analyzed article/video 766 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Meredith results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 462 hits . Analysis detected 4,096 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,064 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 85% (8,350 of 54,266 keywords). This Amanda Meredith is worse (more manipulative) than 84.60% of the peer group. Amanda Meredith
Keyword details
Total words: 3,064
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.6% percentile 4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Horn Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Straw Man: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst