Keyword summary
10% 1 analyzed article/video 528 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alliance For A Clean Texas results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 88 hits . Analysis detected 576 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,112 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 25% (39,111 of 51,996 keywords). This Alliance For A Clean Texas is better (less manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group. Alliance For A Clean Texas
Keyword details
Total words: 2,112
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.0% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst