Keyword summary
89% 1 analyzed article/video 1,436 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aging Politicians results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 762 hits . Analysis detected 6,095 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,744 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 59% (24,697 of 59,653 keywords). This Aging Politicians is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group. Aging Politicians
Keyword details
Total words: 5,744
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst