Keyword summary
66%1 analyzed article/video768 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aaron Ford results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 206 hits. Analysis detected 1,978 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 47% (18,051 of 33,961 keywords). This Aaron Ford is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
Aaron Ford
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Aaron Ford attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Aaron Ford vs sitewide
Aaron Ford attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.