Author summary
⁠15%1 analyzed article/video1,140 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Harwood results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 162 hits. Analysis detected 1,140 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (4,398 of 6,628 authors). This William Harwood is better (less manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
William Harwood
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠34%William Harwood (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,420
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
William Harwood attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
William Harwood vs sitewide
William Harwood attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos