Author summary
40% 1 analyzed article/video 739 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William A. Haseltine Ph.D. results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Overconfidence Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 385 hits . Analysis detected 1,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,956 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 54% (4,379 of 9,471 authors). This William A. Haseltine Ph.D. is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group. William A. Haseltine Ph.D.
Author details
Total words: 2,956
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.8% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.0% 13.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 7.8% 7.8% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Composition/Division: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Straw Man: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Primacy Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst