Author summary
92%1 analyzed article/video525 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WDET Staff results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 337 hits. Analysis detected 1,839 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,575 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 84% (893 of 5,453 authors). This WDET Staff is worse (more manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group.
WDET Staff
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
WDET Staff attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
WDET Staff vs sitewide
WDET Staff attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.