BS Summary: These Venus Beland results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 488 hits. Analysis detected 3,248 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (2,206 of 4,699 authors). This Venus Beland is worse (more manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Venus Beland
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Sophia Gates0%
⁠0%SIMRAN PARWANI0%
⁠0%SILVIA STELLACCI0%
⁠1%Sergey Radchenko0%
⁠1%Robert Lloyd0%
⁠54%Venus Beland (selected)3%
⁠100%Kanoko Matsuyama54%
⁠100%Alex Horton56%
⁠100%Zahara Hill58%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt70%
⁠100%Bill Radke70%
Author details
Total words: 4,116
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Venus Beland attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Venus Beland vs All Other Publications
Venus Beland attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.