Author summary
⁠13%1 analyzed article/video932 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tina Sfondeles results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 272 hits. Analysis detected 1,941 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,728 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (3,663 of 4,887 authors). This Tina Sfondeles is better (less manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Tina Sfondeles
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠26%Tina Sfondeles (selected)2%
⁠100%Daniel Arkin38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,728
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Tina Sfondeles attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Tina Sfondeles vs sitewide
Tina Sfondeles attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos