Author summary
13%2 analyzed articles/videos1,718 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Carlin results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 323 hits. Analysis detected 2,217 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,872 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 9% (8,186 of 8,940 authors). This Tim Carlin is better (less manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group.
Tim Carlin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
9%Tim Carlin (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,872
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

8% percentile
02550751008.4% percentile
1.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos