Author summary
28% 1 analyzed article/video 960 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathaly Suquinagua results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Pessimism Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 309 hits . Analysis detected 1,694 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 40% (5,433 of 8,944 authors). This Nathaly Suquinagua is better (less manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group. Nathaly Suquinagua
Author details
Total words: 3,840
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst