BS Summary: These The Conversation results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Overconfidence Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 230 hits. Analysis detected 1,676 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 26% (3,625 of 4,848 authors). This The Conversation is better (less manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group.
The Conversation
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Sophia Gates0%
0%SIMRAN PARWANI0%
0%SILVIA STELLACCI0%
1%Sergey Radchenko0%
1%Robert Lloyd0%
26%The Conversation (selected)2%
100%Kanoko Matsuyama54%
100%Alex Horton56%
100%Zahara Hill58%
100%Kevin Kniestedt70%
100%Bill Radke70%
Author details
Total words: 3,820
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
The Conversation attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
The Conversation vs All Other Publications
The Conversation attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.