Author summary
44% 1 analyzed article/video 604 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Signal Cleveland results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 297 hits . Analysis detected 1,420 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 73% (2,426 of 8,737 authors). This Signal Cleveland is worse (more manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group. Signal Cleveland
Author details
Total words: 2,416
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.2% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.9% 10.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 12.3% 12.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 12.3%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.3% Composition/Division: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst