Author summary
43%2 analyzed articles/videos927 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Mueller results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 442 hits. Analysis detected 1,984 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,708 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 38% (5,718 of 9,085 authors). This Sarah Mueller is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group.
Sarah Mueller
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
38%Sarah Mueller (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,708
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

37% percentile
025507510037.1% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.9%11.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.7%Burden of Proof: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Tu Quoque: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate