Author summary
10%1 analyzed article/video438 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Marloff results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 140 hits. Analysis detected 510 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 37% (5,963 of 9,471 authors). This Sarah Marloff is better (less manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Sarah Marloff
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
37%Sarah Marloff (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,752
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

37% percentile
025507510037.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 8.0%8.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.5%2.5%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos